Oklahoma City — An Oklahoma County district judge ruled Monday that she would not delay the executions of two death row inmates scheduled for later this month while the inmates challenge the state over the origins of the drugs used to carry out the death penalty.
Citing a 1992 state Supreme Court decision, District Court Judge Patricia Parrish said the state Court of Criminal Appeals, which sets execution dates, must decide on requests for stays of execution. State lawyers earlier Monday filed an objection stating Parrish has no jurisdiction in the case.
Susanna M. Gattoni, one of the lawyers for Lockett and Warner, said her office would appeal Parrish’s decision with the Oklahoma Supreme Court within 24 hours.
Parrish said, however, that she or another civil judge could handle the death row inmates’ challenge to the state’s execution procedure because the Court of Criminal Appeals does not have jurisdiction to rule in a civil matter. Clayton Lockett and Charles Warner have sued the Oklahoma Department of Corrections to learn more about the drugs that would be used to execute them.
“This lawsuit is another attempt by two convicted murders to buy more time to circumvent the judgment of a jury and the will of the people of Oklahoma. They are not innocent citizens who deserve our sympathy,” Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt said in a statement.
State law protects the anonymity of pharmacies that provide Oklahoma’s execution drugs. Lawyers for the inmates said in their lawsuit that this refusal to disclose the origins of the drugs violated the inmates’ constitutional rights to due process and freedom from cruel and unusual punishment.
Lockett is scheduled for execution on March 20 and Warner on March 27. The state will continue to move forward with execution procedures until told otherwise, said Jerry Massie, a spokesman for the Oklahoma Department of Corrections.