- Ada, Oklahoma

December 14, 2011

Tribal leaders see generational divide

The Ada News

Ada —  

Editor, The Ada News:

When our longstanding efforts to commence meaningful water negotiations with state officials failed to produce results, the Chickasaw and Choctaw nations had no reasonable option but to file suit that seeks to stop what we hold to be the unauthorized actions of state and municipal officials.  For an appropriate resolution, we believe the parties must stop acting unilaterally in trying to export our most precious natural resource.

Our goal has always been and will always be reasonable resolution — one that benefits all Oklahomans.  We structured our suit to facilitate a forum for this type of resolution. Since we filed, the  parties (at the court’s encouragement) have met and agreed to negotiations and this month, the court has issued an order appointing a mediator.  That is a very positive step forward; one that we hope marks our taking a responsible step toward meaningful engagement and resolution.

At the same time and away from the negotiating table, the state has indicated it intends to start a massive stream adjudication that would reach from the city of Ada to the Arkansas border and include all or part of 11 counties. On December 13, the Oklahoma Water Resources Board will consider authorizing the filing of such suit, which will broaden and entrench the conflicts among Oklahomans over water resource issues.

Unlike the carefully structured suit the Chickasaw and Choctaw nations filed, Oklahoma’s lawsuit will proceed against thousands of individual Oklahomans, seeking to force each and every one of them to retain a lawyer and proceed to court to prove  whatever right to water they think they have or their neighbors don’t have.  Not only would such action — if Oklahoma follows through with it — not resolve the issues the Chickasaw and Choctaw nations have highlighted in their suit, but the state’s lawsuit would condemn Oklahomans to a generational fight that pits neighbor against neighbor and community against community on a scale that this state has never seen before.

We condemn such unwise course of conduct in the strongest of terms.

Citizens of the Chickasaw and Choctaw nations, like all Oklahomans, have a vital interest in maintaining the conditions necessary to ensure a strong economy and a thriving natural environment for our children and grandchildren. Water is an essential element of that equation for all of us.

For that reason, it is vitally important state and tribal leaders come together and work to develop a mutually agreeable  plan for the sustainable long-term management of the water resources on which we all rely.  That will take hard and concentrated work, but we see it as our duty as tribal leaders to reach out and across the table toward a common good.  We believe such an approach is the only one that will serve all Oklahomans and that the proposed stream adjudication is a precipitous step in the wrong direction.


Bill Anoatubby


The Chickasaw Nation

Greg Pyle

Principle Chief

The Choctaw Nation


Editor, The Ada News:

I enjoyed your assessment of Atlas Shrugged.

Then you spoke of those that believe you can run benevolence through the government.

I see nothing charitable about government taking money from the productive, by force of arms, and if you do not give this money to government, eventually someone from government will be at your house with a gun to take you or your money. Is that charity? To devise a plan to take a worker’s earning to give it to a non-worker is conspiracy and thievery.

Benevolence is when a successful person reaches into his own pocket and gives willingly to someone he perceives to be in need.

Although Americans are greedy, dirty, capitalist pigs, we are the most compassionate and generous people on this globe we call Earth.

The Declaration of Independence says, we instituted our government to protect our God-given rights which include our rightful holdings.

Government has become the greatest thief in modern society.

Everyone in Washington must have a brother-in-law working to administer these so-called charity programs because 75 percent of the funds collected never reach the intended. Besides, most of the people I’ve known collecting government freebies don’t need them. They simply take advantage of the program because they qualify.

Government’s job is to govern, not to be a church, a Red Cross or a Salvation Army.

Jerry Waddle